A Multi-Criteria Decision-Support Framework for Heritage Materials

dc.contributor.affiliationDepartamento de Construcciones Arquitectónicas
dc.contributor.affiliationEscuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería de Edificación
dc.contributor.affiliationCentro de Investigación de Tecnología de la Edificación
dc.contributor.authorBernardo, Graziellaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorPalmero Iglesias, Luís Manuel
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Commissiones_ES
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-10T06:19:23Z
dc.date.available2026-06-10T06:19:23Z
dc.date.issued2026-05-06es_ES
dc.description.abstract[EN] The evaluation of heritage materials remains a critical challenge within circular economy frameworks, where existing approaches primarily focus on technical and environmental performance while neglecting cultural, historical, and contextual dimensions. This study proposes a Building Heritage Material Passport (BHMP)-based multi-criteria decisionsupport framework that operates at the material level, integrating structured material data, multi-criteria evaluation, and decision-making within a unified methodology. The approach combines technical indicators (Compatibility and Durability) with heritagedriven indicators (Traceability and Cultural Value) and applies fuzzy scoring together with context-sensitive weighting based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), enabling the integration of qualitative and quantitative assessments under conditions of uncertainty. A key feature of the framework is the introduction of a threshold-based decision mechanism that directly translates evaluation outcomes into operational intervention strategies, distinguishing between conservation and reuse pathways. This enables the evaluation process to move beyond descriptive assessment and operate as an explicit decision-support tool. The methodology is validated through its application to two degraded heritage buildings located in the Valle dell¿Agri (Basilicata, Italy), characterized by different levels of material traceability and cultural significance. The results demonstrate the ability of the framework to generate consistent, transparent, and context-aware decisions, effectively balancing technical performance with heritage values. The proposed approach contributes to bridging the gap between digital material documentation, multi-criteria evaluation, and decision-making processes, supporting more effective and sustainable management of heritage materials in circular economy contexts.es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethodSes_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitationBernardo, G.; Palmero Iglesias, Luís Manuel (2026). A Multi-Criteria Decision-Support Framework for Heritage Materials. Applied Sciences. 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16094564es_ES
dc.description.referencesGhisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016). A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 11-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007es_ES
dc.description.referencesPomponi, F., & Moncaster, A. (2017). Circular economy for the built environment: A research framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 710-718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.055es_ES
dc.description.referencesKrausmann, F., Wiedenhofer, D., Lauk, C., Haas, W., Tanikawa, H., Fishman, T., Miatto, A., Schandl, H., & Haberl, H. (2017). Global socioeconomic material stocks rise 23-fold over the 20th century and require half of annual resource use. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(8), 1880-1885. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1613773114es_ES
dc.description.referencesBocken. (2016). Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. J. Ind. Prod. Eng. 33.es_ES
dc.description.referencesMunaro, M. R., & Tavares, S. F. (2021). Materials passport’s review: challenges and opportunities toward a circular economy building sector. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(4), 767-782. https://doi.org/10.1108/bepam-02-2020-0027es_ES
dc.description.referencesSacks, R., Eastman, C., Lee, G., and Teicholz, P. (2018). BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Designers, Engineers, Contractors, and Facility Managers, Wiley.es_ES
dc.description.referencesAtta, I., Bakhoum, E.S., and Marzouk, M.M. (2021). Digitizing material passport for sustainable construction projects using BIM. J. Build. Eng., 43.es_ES
dc.description.referencesBoje, C., Guerriero, A., Kubicki, S., and Rezgui, Y. (2020). Towards a semantic Construction Digital Twin: Directions for future research. Autom. Constr., 114.es_ES
dc.description.referencesWang, T., and Chen, H.-M. (2023). Integration of building information modeling and project management in construction project life cycle. Autom. Constr., 150.es_ES
dc.description.referencesBAMB Consortium (2026, February 02). Buildings As Material Banks Project. Available online: https://www.bamb2020.eu/.es_ES
dc.description.referencesFuller, A., Fan, Z., Day, C., & Barlow, C. (2020). Digital Twin: Enabling Technologies, Challenges and Open Research. IEEE Access, 8, 108952-108971. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2998358es_ES
dc.description.referencesDurmisevic, E. Circular Economy in Construction. Design Strategies for Revesible Buildings, BAMB. Available online: https://www.bamb2020.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Reversible-Building-Design-Strateges.pdf.es_ES
dc.description.referencesMadaster Foundation (2026, February 12). Material Passport Platform. Available online: https://www.madaster.com/.es_ES
dc.description.referencesEuropean Union (2026, January 12). Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 (ESPR). Available online: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1781/oj.es_ES
dc.description.referencesEuropean Union (2026, January 14). Regulation (EU) 2024/3110 (CPR). Available online: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/3110/oj.es_ES
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission (2025). Ecodesign for Sustainable Products and Energy Labelling Working Plan 2025–2030, European Commission. Available online: https://environment.ec.europa.eu/document/download/5f7ff5e2-ebe9-4bd4-a139-db881bd6398f_en?filename=FAQ-UPDATE-4th-Iteration_clean.pdf.es_ES
dc.description.referencesGravagnuolo. (2020). Evaluation of environmental impacts of historic buildings conservation through Life Cycle Assessment in a circular economy perspective. Aestimum. 77.es_ES
dc.description.referencesFoster, G. (2020). Circular economy strategies for adaptive reuse of cultural heritage buildings to reduce environmental impacts. Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 152.es_ES
dc.description.referencesOrbaşlı, A. (2007). Architectural Conservation: Principles and Practice, Wiley.es_ES
dc.description.referencesJokilehto, J. (2018). History of Architectural Conservation, Routledge. [2nd ed.].es_ES
dc.description.referencesKebede, R., Moscati, A., Tan, H., & Johansson, P. (2024). A modular ontology modeling approach to developing digital product passports to promote circular economy in the built environment. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 48, 248-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2024.05.007es_ES
dc.description.referencesPsarommatis, F., and May, G. (2024). Digital Product Passport: A Pathway to Circularity and Sustainability in Modern Manufacturing. Sustainability, 16.es_ES
dc.description.referencesShahzad, M., Tah, J.H., Younas, M., and Almukhtar, A. (2025). Technologies and techniques in digital twins for real-time data visualisation in building maintenance: A state-of-the-art review. J. Infrastruct. Intell. Resil., 4.es_ES
dc.description.referencesParece, S., Resende, R., and Rato, V. (2024). A BIM-based tool for embodied carbon assessment using a Construction Classification System. Dev. Built Environ., 19.es_ES
dc.description.referencesResta, L. F., Bögle, A., & Mondino, D. (2024). Enhancing heritage building preservation with MCDM and HBIM: A research proposal. Procedia Structural Integrity, 64, 2165-2172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2024.09.330es_ES
dc.description.referencesCorrao. (2024). Building Heritage Materials Passports (BHMPs) for resilient communities. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of Ar.Tec. (Scientific Society of Architectural Engineering) Colloqui.AT.e 2024, Palermo, Italy, 12–15 June 2024. Volume 3.es_ES
dc.description.referencesBakindi, A., Wiberg, A.H., Norman, J., Marsh, E., and Allen, S. (2025). Hybrid life cycle assessment (H-LCA) for buildings and construction materials: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Build. Environ., 272.es_ES
dc.description.referencesSerrano-Baena, M.M., Ruiz-Díaz, C., Boronat, P.G., and Mercader-Moyano, P. (2023). Optimising LCA in complex buildings with MLCAQ: A BIM-based methodology for automated multi-criteria materials selection. Energy Build., 294.es_ES
dc.description.referencesSaaty, R. W. (1987). The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling, 9(3-5), 161-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8es_ES
dc.description.referencesIshizaka. (2011). Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process. Expert Syst. Appl. 38.es_ES
dc.description.referencesAhmed, F., & Kilic, K. (2019). Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process: A performance analysis of various algorithms. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 362, 110-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2018.08.009es_ES
dc.description.referencesNadkarni, R.R., and Puthuvayi, B. (2020). A comprehensive literature review of Multi-Criteria Decision Making methods in heritage buildings. J. Build. Eng., 32.es_ES
dc.description.referencesLiu, X., Xiao, X., Tian, C., Li, H., and Zhu, G. (2025). Multi-criteria decision-making in the adaptive reuse of historic buildings: A bibliometric and systematic review of practices in China. J. Asian Arch. Build. Eng., 1–26.es_ES
dc.description.referencesOlimpio, L.C.M., Campos, V.R., and Mesquita, E.F.T. (2026). H-MCDM Model to the Preservation of Dynamic Historic Urban Sites. Built Herit., 10.es_ES
dc.description.referencesMaselli, G., Cucco, P., Nesticò, A., and Ribera, F. (2024). Historical heritage–MultiCriteria Decision Method (H-MCDM) to prioritize intervention strategies for the adaptive reuse of valuable architectural assets. MethodsX, 12.es_ES
dc.description.referencesAkter, F., Wang, S., Wang, R., Galib, M.A., Medin, Z.Y., and Song, F. (2025). Historic port conservation multi-criteria evaluation based on AHP–TOPSIS: Cases from the UK, Spain and China. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun., 12.es_ES
dc.description.referencesBajwa, A.U.R., Siriwardana, C., Shahzad, W., and Naeem, M.A. (2025). Material selection in the construction industry: A systematic literature review on multi-criteria decision making. Environ. Syst. Decis., 45.es_ES
dc.description.referencesDalkey, N., & Helmer, O. (1963). An Experimental Application of the DELPHI Method to the Use of Experts. Management Science, 9(3), 458-467. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.9.3.458es_ES
dc.description.referencesAdler, M., and Ziglio, E. (1996). The Delphi Method and its Application to Social Policy and Public Health. The Delphi Method, Springer.es_ES
dc.description.referencesHsu, C.-C., and Sandford, B.A. (2007). The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus. Pract. Assess. Res. Eval., 12.es_ES
dc.description.referencesPowell, C. (2003). The Delphi technique: myths and realities. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 41(4), 376-382. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02537.xes_ES
dc.description.referencesHanna, K., & Noble, B. F. (2015). Using a Delphi study to identify effectiveness criteria for environmental assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 33(2), 116-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2014.992672es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe research was funded by the European Union Next Generation EU, Mission 4 Component 1 CUP C43C22000400006 Research project Tech4You Technologies for climate change adaptation and quality of life improvement , Pilot Project 4.2.1, Materials, architecture and design: open knowledge and innovative digital tools for cultural heritage .es_ES
dc.description.volume16es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/app16094564es_ES
dc.identifier.eissn2076-3417es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/236014
dc.languageIngléses_ES
dc.publisherMDPI AGes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Scienceses_ES
dc.relation.pasarelaS\583563es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC//C43C22000400006/es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.3390/app16094564es_ES
dc.rightsReconocimiento (by)es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsAbiertoes_ES
dc.subjectBuilding Heritage Material Passport (BHMP)es_ES
dc.subjectHeritage conservationes_ES
dc.subjectCircular economyes_ES
dc.subjectHeritage material reusees_ES
dc.subjectMulti-criteria decision-making (MCDM)es_ES
dc.subjectDecision-support frameworkes_ES
dc.subjectFuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP)es_ES
dc.subjectCultural value assessmentes_ES
dc.subjectMaterial reusees_ES
dc.titleA Multi-Criteria Decision-Support Framework for Heritage Materialses_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
person.identifier3608
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-0046-5134
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationca8a35a5-cb64-44fd-a012-c939c423a49a
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryca8a35a5-cb64-44fd-a012-c939c423a49a
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication74535f31-c7e4-4498-94d8-d383211eb09b
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationde470012-4694-43ee-87f9-6cafbd5e0f95
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication2b10555d-ef13-46a0-845e-77b9c48aeb40
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery74535f31-c7e4-4498-94d8-d383211eb09b
upv.uuidb1a82549-9cf9-4d76-bc80-5284775b2264es_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
BernardoPalmero - A Multi-Criteria Decision-Support Framework for Heritage Materials.pdf
Tamaño:
1.71 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión editorial