A Multi-Criteria Decision-Support Framework for Heritage Materials
| dc.contributor.affiliation | Departamento de Construcciones Arquitectónicas | |
| dc.contributor.affiliation | Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería de Edificación | |
| dc.contributor.affiliation | Centro de Investigación de Tecnología de la Edificación | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bernardo, Graziella | es_ES |
| dc.contributor.author | Palmero Iglesias, Luís Manuel | |
| dc.contributor.funder | European Commission | es_ES |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-06-10T06:19:23Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-06-10T06:19:23Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026-05-06 | es_ES |
| dc.description.abstract | [EN] The evaluation of heritage materials remains a critical challenge within circular economy frameworks, where existing approaches primarily focus on technical and environmental performance while neglecting cultural, historical, and contextual dimensions. This study proposes a Building Heritage Material Passport (BHMP)-based multi-criteria decisionsupport framework that operates at the material level, integrating structured material data, multi-criteria evaluation, and decision-making within a unified methodology. The approach combines technical indicators (Compatibility and Durability) with heritagedriven indicators (Traceability and Cultural Value) and applies fuzzy scoring together with context-sensitive weighting based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), enabling the integration of qualitative and quantitative assessments under conditions of uncertainty. A key feature of the framework is the introduction of a threshold-based decision mechanism that directly translates evaluation outcomes into operational intervention strategies, distinguishing between conservation and reuse pathways. This enables the evaluation process to move beyond descriptive assessment and operate as an explicit decision-support tool. The methodology is validated through its application to two degraded heritage buildings located in the Valle dell¿Agri (Basilicata, Italy), characterized by different levels of material traceability and cultural significance. The results demonstrate the ability of the framework to generate consistent, transparent, and context-aware decisions, effectively balancing technical performance with heritage values. The proposed approach contributes to bridging the gap between digital material documentation, multi-criteria evaluation, and decision-making processes, supporting more effective and sustainable management of heritage materials in circular economy contexts. | es_ES |
| dc.description.accrualMethod | S | es_ES |
| dc.description.bibliographicCitation | Bernardo, G.; Palmero Iglesias, Luís Manuel (2026). A Multi-Criteria Decision-Support Framework for Heritage Materials. Applied Sciences. 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16094564 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016). A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 11-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Pomponi, F., & Moncaster, A. (2017). Circular economy for the built environment: A research framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 710-718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.055 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Krausmann, F., Wiedenhofer, D., Lauk, C., Haas, W., Tanikawa, H., Fishman, T., Miatto, A., Schandl, H., & Haberl, H. (2017). Global socioeconomic material stocks rise 23-fold over the 20th century and require half of annual resource use. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(8), 1880-1885. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1613773114 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Bocken. (2016). Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. J. Ind. Prod. Eng. 33. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Munaro, M. R., & Tavares, S. F. (2021). Materials passport’s review: challenges and opportunities toward a circular economy building sector. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(4), 767-782. https://doi.org/10.1108/bepam-02-2020-0027 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Sacks, R., Eastman, C., Lee, G., and Teicholz, P. (2018). BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Designers, Engineers, Contractors, and Facility Managers, Wiley. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Atta, I., Bakhoum, E.S., and Marzouk, M.M. (2021). Digitizing material passport for sustainable construction projects using BIM. J. Build. Eng., 43. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Boje, C., Guerriero, A., Kubicki, S., and Rezgui, Y. (2020). Towards a semantic Construction Digital Twin: Directions for future research. Autom. Constr., 114. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Wang, T., and Chen, H.-M. (2023). Integration of building information modeling and project management in construction project life cycle. Autom. Constr., 150. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | BAMB Consortium (2026, February 02). Buildings As Material Banks Project. Available online: https://www.bamb2020.eu/. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Fuller, A., Fan, Z., Day, C., & Barlow, C. (2020). Digital Twin: Enabling Technologies, Challenges and Open Research. IEEE Access, 8, 108952-108971. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2998358 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Durmisevic, E. Circular Economy in Construction. Design Strategies for Revesible Buildings, BAMB. Available online: https://www.bamb2020.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Reversible-Building-Design-Strateges.pdf. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Madaster Foundation (2026, February 12). Material Passport Platform. Available online: https://www.madaster.com/. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | European Union (2026, January 12). Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 (ESPR). Available online: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1781/oj. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | European Union (2026, January 14). Regulation (EU) 2024/3110 (CPR). Available online: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/3110/oj. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | European Commission (2025). Ecodesign for Sustainable Products and Energy Labelling Working Plan 2025–2030, European Commission. Available online: https://environment.ec.europa.eu/document/download/5f7ff5e2-ebe9-4bd4-a139-db881bd6398f_en?filename=FAQ-UPDATE-4th-Iteration_clean.pdf. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Gravagnuolo. (2020). Evaluation of environmental impacts of historic buildings conservation through Life Cycle Assessment in a circular economy perspective. Aestimum. 77. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Foster, G. (2020). Circular economy strategies for adaptive reuse of cultural heritage buildings to reduce environmental impacts. Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 152. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Orbaşlı, A. (2007). Architectural Conservation: Principles and Practice, Wiley. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Jokilehto, J. (2018). History of Architectural Conservation, Routledge. [2nd ed.]. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Kebede, R., Moscati, A., Tan, H., & Johansson, P. (2024). A modular ontology modeling approach to developing digital product passports to promote circular economy in the built environment. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 48, 248-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2024.05.007 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Psarommatis, F., and May, G. (2024). Digital Product Passport: A Pathway to Circularity and Sustainability in Modern Manufacturing. Sustainability, 16. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Shahzad, M., Tah, J.H., Younas, M., and Almukhtar, A. (2025). Technologies and techniques in digital twins for real-time data visualisation in building maintenance: A state-of-the-art review. J. Infrastruct. Intell. Resil., 4. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Parece, S., Resende, R., and Rato, V. (2024). A BIM-based tool for embodied carbon assessment using a Construction Classification System. Dev. Built Environ., 19. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Resta, L. F., Bögle, A., & Mondino, D. (2024). Enhancing heritage building preservation with MCDM and HBIM: A research proposal. Procedia Structural Integrity, 64, 2165-2172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2024.09.330 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Corrao. (2024). Building Heritage Materials Passports (BHMPs) for resilient communities. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of Ar.Tec. (Scientific Society of Architectural Engineering) Colloqui.AT.e 2024, Palermo, Italy, 12–15 June 2024. Volume 3. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Bakindi, A., Wiberg, A.H., Norman, J., Marsh, E., and Allen, S. (2025). Hybrid life cycle assessment (H-LCA) for buildings and construction materials: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Build. Environ., 272. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Serrano-Baena, M.M., Ruiz-Díaz, C., Boronat, P.G., and Mercader-Moyano, P. (2023). Optimising LCA in complex buildings with MLCAQ: A BIM-based methodology for automated multi-criteria materials selection. Energy Build., 294. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Saaty, R. W. (1987). The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling, 9(3-5), 161-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Ishizaka. (2011). Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process. Expert Syst. Appl. 38. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Ahmed, F., & Kilic, K. (2019). Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process: A performance analysis of various algorithms. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 362, 110-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2018.08.009 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Nadkarni, R.R., and Puthuvayi, B. (2020). A comprehensive literature review of Multi-Criteria Decision Making methods in heritage buildings. J. Build. Eng., 32. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Liu, X., Xiao, X., Tian, C., Li, H., and Zhu, G. (2025). Multi-criteria decision-making in the adaptive reuse of historic buildings: A bibliometric and systematic review of practices in China. J. Asian Arch. Build. Eng., 1–26. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Olimpio, L.C.M., Campos, V.R., and Mesquita, E.F.T. (2026). H-MCDM Model to the Preservation of Dynamic Historic Urban Sites. Built Herit., 10. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Maselli, G., Cucco, P., Nesticò, A., and Ribera, F. (2024). Historical heritage–MultiCriteria Decision Method (H-MCDM) to prioritize intervention strategies for the adaptive reuse of valuable architectural assets. MethodsX, 12. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Akter, F., Wang, S., Wang, R., Galib, M.A., Medin, Z.Y., and Song, F. (2025). Historic port conservation multi-criteria evaluation based on AHP–TOPSIS: Cases from the UK, Spain and China. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun., 12. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Bajwa, A.U.R., Siriwardana, C., Shahzad, W., and Naeem, M.A. (2025). Material selection in the construction industry: A systematic literature review on multi-criteria decision making. Environ. Syst. Decis., 45. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Dalkey, N., & Helmer, O. (1963). An Experimental Application of the DELPHI Method to the Use of Experts. Management Science, 9(3), 458-467. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.9.3.458 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Adler, M., and Ziglio, E. (1996). The Delphi Method and its Application to Social Policy and Public Health. The Delphi Method, Springer. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Hsu, C.-C., and Sandford, B.A. (2007). The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus. Pract. Assess. Res. Eval., 12. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Powell, C. (2003). The Delphi technique: myths and realities. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 41(4), 376-382. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02537.x | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Hanna, K., & Noble, B. F. (2015). Using a Delphi study to identify effectiveness criteria for environmental assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 33(2), 116-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2014.992672 | es_ES |
| dc.description.sponsorship | The research was funded by the European Union Next Generation EU, Mission 4 Component 1 CUP C43C22000400006 Research project Tech4You Technologies for climate change adaptation and quality of life improvement , Pilot Project 4.2.1, Materials, architecture and design: open knowledge and innovative digital tools for cultural heritage . | es_ES |
| dc.description.volume | 16 | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/app16094564 | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2076-3417 | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/236014 | |
| dc.language | Inglés | es_ES |
| dc.publisher | MDPI AG | es_ES |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Applied Sciences | es_ES |
| dc.relation.pasarela | S\583563 | es_ES |
| dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC//C43C22000400006/ | es_ES |
| dc.relation.publisherversion | https://doi.org/10.3390/app16094564 | es_ES |
| dc.rights | Reconocimiento (by) | es_ES |
| dc.rights.accessRights | Abierto | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Building Heritage Material Passport (BHMP) | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Heritage conservation | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Circular economy | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Heritage material reuse | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Decision-support framework | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Cultural value assessment | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Material reuse | es_ES |
| dc.title | A Multi-Criteria Decision-Support Framework for Heritage Materials | es_ES |
| dc.type | Artículo | es_ES |
| dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| person.identifier | 3608 | |
| person.identifier.orcid | 0000-0003-0046-5134 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | ca8a35a5-cb64-44fd-a012-c939c423a49a | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | ca8a35a5-cb64-44fd-a012-c939c423a49a | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | 74535f31-c7e4-4498-94d8-d383211eb09b | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | de470012-4694-43ee-87f9-6cafbd5e0f95 | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | 2b10555d-ef13-46a0-845e-77b9c48aeb40 | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 74535f31-c7e4-4498-94d8-d383211eb09b | |
| upv.uuid | b1a82549-9cf9-4d76-bc80-5284775b2264 | es_ES |
Archivos
Bloque original
1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
- Nombre:
- BernardoPalmero - A Multi-Criteria Decision-Support Framework for Heritage Materials.pdf
- Tamaño:
- 1.71 MB
- Formato:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Descripción:
- Versión editorial